JOEL - You know I was just thinking something similar the
other day as I was reading a U.S. history year book
during the time I was born. Do you know that there is
not one mention of me even being born in that book,
nor do any of the following year books mention anything I
did in my life time? :-)
I guess someone forgot to mention Laban as well in the
Bible.
I wouldn't call Laban a "ruler". The only hint we get
about Laban's status in Jerusalem is found in 1 Nephi
4:22, where it implies that he might have been
one of the prominent elders of Jerusalem, having
several servants(1 Nep 3:25).
He may also have been some sort of military leader as
well considering that he owned a suit of armor and a
rather remarkable sword. (1 Nep. 4:9)
How Laban obtained the brass plates and where they
originally came from are not known. Several theories
have been advanced, including the possibility that the
plates of brass originated in the days of Joseph of
Egypt. The Book of Mormon indicates that Laban
and his father had inherited and preserved the record
because they were descendants of this Joseph (1 Ne.
5:16).
The brass plates contained some of the history
and religious doctrines of Lehi's forefathers. It
contained copies of scriptures of Isaiah and a couple
of other prophets from the Old Testament times.
They were important to Lehi because he was about to
set out to a new land and wanted to be sure he had a
copy of these things to take with him to preserve the
knowledge they contained. Laban just happened to have
a copy of them.
Just because Laban is not mentioned in the Old Testament
does not mean that he didn't exist. He was not a
prophet nor a king and evidently not important enough
for any other reason to earn a mention.
Return to top